Daniel Stutzbach <daniel <at> stutzbachenterprises.com> writes: > For the "10MB whole contents at once" test, we then have: > (assuming the code does no pipelining of disk I/O with decoding) > > 10MB / 980MB/s to read from disk = 10 ms > 10MB / 250MB/s to decode to utf8 = 40 ms > 10MB / (10ms + 40ms) = 200 MB/s > > In practice, your results shows around 90 MB/s. That's at least vaguely in > the same ballpark. Yes, the remaining CPU time is spent in the IncrementalNewlineDecoder (which does universal newline translation). Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4