On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > I have no problem with removing things that were advertised and/or > documented to be removed in 3.0 but accidentally were not. That seems like > a reasonable policy to me. However, if we did not tell people that > something was going to be removed, then I don't think we can really remove > it in 3.0. As others have said, this would technically include cmp() removal. In the 2.x docs, there are big warnings by the operator functions and a suggestion to use ABCs. We also already have a 2to3 fixer for the module. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4