A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085576.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1

[Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1 [Python-Dev] Python 3.0.1Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Wed Jan 28 00:37:52 CET 2009
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:
> I have no problem with removing things that were advertised and/or
> documented to be removed in 3.0 but accidentally were not.  That seems like
> a reasonable policy to me.  However, if we did not tell people that
> something was going to be removed, then I don't think we can really remove
> it in 3.0.

As others have said, this would technically include cmp() removal. In
the 2.x docs, there are big warnings by the operator functions and a
suggestion to use ABCs. We also already have a 2to3 fixer for the
module.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4