> Just set a size limit, e.g. 30 or 100. It's just a heuristic. I > believe somewhere in Python itself I intern string literals if they > are reasonably short and fit the pattern of an identifier; I'd worry > that the pattern matching would slow down unpickling more than the > expected benefit though, so perhaps just a size test would be better. Ok. So, Jake, it's back to my original request - please submit this to the tracker (preferably along with test cases). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4