RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 25 00:34:40 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085426.html

>> Second, I think it would be good to explicitly mention the option of
>> deferring this PEP.  Based on previous discussion, it sounds like there
>> are a fair number of people who think that there is a DVCS in Python's
>> future, but not now (where "now" means over the next couple of years).
> 
> Sure, I can add a note somewhere that says if a clear winner doesn't
> come about the PEP can be revisited to a later date.
> 

I think the request is slightly different: consider that a potential
outcome should be "svn for the next five years, then reconsider" - not
because none of the DVCS is a clear winner, but because there is too
much resistance to DVCSes in general, at the moment.

Regards,
Martin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085426.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 374 (DVCS) now in reST