RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 23 23:28:49 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085397.html

anatoly techtonik wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Roumen Petrov
> <bugtrack at roumenpetrov.info> wrote:
>>> Against 2.3, rejected due to dependence on SCons.
>>> Also appears to have been incomplete, needing more work.
>> No it was complete but use SCons. Most of changes changes in code you will
>> see again in 3871.
>>
> 
> I would better use SCons for both unix and windows builds. In case of
> windows for both compilers - mingw and microsoft ones. To port curses
> extension to windows I need to know what gcc options mean, what are
> the rules to write Makefiles and how to repeat these rules as well as
> find options in visual studio interface. Not mentioning various
> platform-specific defines and warning fixes.

Did you select one of existing curses library for windows ?

Roumen

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085397.html below:

[Python-Dev] About SCons Re: progress: compiling python2.5 under msys (specifically but not exclusively under wine) with msvcr80