On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 07:30, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brett, thanks for putting this PEP together! > Yep. Just make sure I don't do something like this for a LONG time. Apparently I didn't learn my lesson after the issue tracker migration. > On Jan 23, 2009, at 3:39 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > >> Somebody will have to make a decision. Ultimately, Guido will have to >> approve the PEP, but it might be that he refuses to make a choice of >> specific DVCS. Traditionally, it is the PEP author who makes all >> choices (considering suggestions from the community, of course). So >> what DVCS do the PEP authors recommend? > > Brett, perhaps you should publish a tentative schedule. Milestones I'd like > to see include > > * Initial impressions section completed > * Call for rebuttals > * Second draft of impressions > * (perhaps multiple) Recommendations to Guido and python-dev > * Experimental live branches deployed for testing > * Final recommendation > * Final decision > I think you just published the schedule, Barry. =) Seriously, though, I have several other commitments that take precedent over this PEP so I don't feel comfortable locking down any dates. > My understanding is that a final decision will /not/ be made by Pycon. It's doubtful, but would be nice by then. What I will do is eliminate a contender by/at PyCon. -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4