A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085201.html below:

[Python-Dev] Copyright notices in modules

[Python-Dev] Copyright notices in modules [Python-Dev] Copyright notices in modulesRaymond Hettinger python at rcn.com
Tue Jan 20 00:56:22 CET 2009
Why does numbers.py say:

    # Copyright 2007 Google, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    # Licensed to PSF under a Contributor Agreement.

Weren't there multiple contributors including non-google people?

Does Google want to be associated with code that
was submitted with no tests?

Do we want this sort of stuff in the code?

If someone signs a contributor agreement, can we
forgo the external copyright comments?

Do we want to make a practice of every contributor
commenting in the name of the company they were
working for at the time (if so, I would have to add
the comment to a lot of modules)?

Does the copyright concept even apply to an
abstract base class (I thought APIs were not
subject to copyright, just like database layouts
and language definitions)?


Raymond
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4