On 1/19/2009 6:51 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > The other, posted by Steven Bethard, is that it fundamentally breaks the > current semantics of abbreviating (except for iteration variable > scoping) an 'equivalent' for loop. The proposed syntax would suggest that this should be legal as well: for i in iterable while cond: blahblah or perhaps: while cond for i in iterable: blahblah A while-for or for-while loop would be a novel invention, not seen in any other language that I know of. I seriously doubt its usefulness though... Sturla Molden
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4