A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-January/085161.html below:

[Python-Dev] Strategies for debugging buildbot failures?

[Python-Dev] Strategies for debugging buildbot failures? [Python-Dev] Strategies for debugging buildbot failures?Benjamin Peterson benjamin at python.org
Mon Jan 19 01:26:49 CET 2009
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:25 PM,  <skip at pobox.com> wrote:
>
>    Mark> Is it acceptable to commit a change (to the trunk or py3k, not to
>    Mark> the release branches) solely for the purpose of getting more
>    Mark> information about a failure?
>
> I think it would be kind of nice if you could force a buildbot to use a
> specific branch.  You could then check your diagnostic changes in on a
> branch meant just for that purpose.  Once you're done with your changes you
> could simply delete the branch.

You can already do that. Just click on the name of the buildbot, and
then enter the branch you want it to test.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4