Mark Dickinson <dickinsm <at> gmail.com> writes: > > Benjamin wondered aloud about deprecating PyNumber_Long > in the issue 4910 discussion; I suggested deprecating > PyNumber_Int instead, but on reflection I think Benjamin's right: > it seems neater to keep the PyNumber_Int <-> int() <-> nb_int > naming connections than the PyNumber_Long <-> PyLong > ones. The C API uses the Long (rather than Int) wording, so it would be rather strange to have an outlier in PyNumber_Int. We should keep PyNumber_Long instead.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4