Hello, Amaury (mainly) and I are rewriting the IO stack in C, and there is a small thing in PEP 3116 about the BufferedRandom object that I'd like to clarify: « Q: Do we want to mandate in the specification that switching between reading and writing on a read-write object implies a .flush()? Or is that an implementation convenience that users should not rely on? » Is it ok if I assume that the answer is "it is an implementation convenience that users should not rely on"? The reason is that I'm overhauling BufferedRandom objects to use a single shared buffer, so as to optimize interleaved reads and writes. Thanks Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4