Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > No. Trust me. It is not always possible to strengthen the > implementation. (At least not until we get rid of the "replace all > globals with None upon module deletion" rule.) We should do that. Trying to do cleanup without globals sucks. I updated Armin's patch that's attached to issue #812369. If we could get some more people to bang on it then prehaps we can trust it enough to accept it. If someone wants to test and needs help, give me a shout. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4