Hey Martin, >> The patch is a mere 6 lines of code and provides the absolute minimum >> that is needed to secure the Python interpreter! > > Unlike Guido, I'm not quite willing to your word for it. You are right. Sorry, I was a bit too enthusiastic and overstated the case. How about: "it could possibly enable a secured Python interpreter" ? > OTOH, the patch looks harmless (with minor corrections). It could > be considered a bug fix for the current set of restricted attributes Yes, and it is in that light that I would like the patch to be accepted. -- love, tav plex:espians/tav | tav at espians.com | +44 (0) 7809 569 369 http://tav.espians.com | http://twitter.com/tav | skype:tavespian
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4