A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086256.html below:

[Python-Dev] IO implementation: in C and Python?

[Python-Dev] IO implementation: in C and Python? [Python-Dev] IO implementation: in C and Python?Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Fri Feb 20 11:48:25 CET 2009
Benjamin Peterson <benjamin <at> python.org> writes:
> 
> As we prepare to merge the io-c branch, the question has come up [1]
> about the original Python implementation. Should it just be deleted in
> favor C version? The wish to maintain the two implementations together
> has been raised on the basis that Python is easier to experiment on
> and read (for other vm implementors).

As I said, if it is the way forward, I suggest putting the Python version in a
separate module (e.g. pyio.py), for the sake of clarity and also because it may
slightly improve startup times (the pure-Python module wouldn't get imported in
normal conditions).

Your thoughts?

Regards

Antoine.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4