RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 17 15:20:10 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086182.html

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Samuele Pedroni <pedronis at openend.se> wrote:
> Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that this
> part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that having
> very good/improving test coverage like is recommended  for 3rd-party project
> wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 evolution too. We know from
> PyPy experience that while always improving the test suite coverage is quite
> spotty at times.

No, a test didn't fail. Our new distutils maintainer, Tarek Ziade,
though, has been increasing the distutils test coverage greatly.

-- 
Regards,
Benjamin

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086182.html below:

[Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?