Victor Stinner wrote: > Le Tuesday 17 February 2009 08:52:20 Lennart Regebro, vous avez écrit : > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 00:50, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: >> >>> Can you explain the difficulty with porting setuptools in more detail? >>> >> Oh, it just exposes a bug in distutils. It probably means I'll have to >> make a test for python version, and if it is 3.0.1, monkey-patch >> distutils. I haven't really looked into if there is any other >> possibilities yet, I'm concentrating to make it run for 3.1 trunk >> first. >> > > Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that this part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that having very good/improving test coverage like is recommended for 3rd-party project wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 evolution too. We know from PyPy experience that while always improving the test suite coverage is quite spotty at times.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4