> Martin, I was not clear enough. Please, just tell me: Do you believe > that this addition do make sense? Would you reject it for some reason > (other than a bad patch) ? I would be +0. All other integral types support both signed and signed fields, why not size_t. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4