In article <499723CD.80404 at v.loewis.de>, "Martin v. Lowis" <martin at v.loewis.de> wrote: > > That's fine as long as the distutils issue is resolved. > I don't think this should be a prerequisite. As Ronald says: no fix > without a bug report; if the system is capable of building the extension > correctly, it should do so (so it's a bug and fixes can be backported > to 2.6) And it turns out it should not be a problem for 3.x (and future releases of 2.x). Ronald fixed it several weeks ago here: <http://bugs.python.org/issue4064> Python 3.0.1 (r301:69597, Feb 14 2009, 19:03:52) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple Inc. build 5490)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> from distutils.util import get_platform; print(get_platform()) macosx-10.3-fat >>> My apologies to Ronald and the cohort for not re-examining this recently. The distutils "problem" isn't anymore. -- Ned Deily, nad at acm.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4