RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 14 15:29:54 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086103.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 13, 2009, at 10:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:

> Amen. I can see two scenarios where we might release 3.0.2: (a) if we
> find a really severe error in 3.0.1 (or perhaps a security problem);
> (b) if 3.1 ends up getting delayed severely.
>
> In case (a) happens it's okay if the 3.0 branch is left alone until
> the time we need to make that one patch. The probability of (b) is
> low, so let's worry about that when it happens, and let's try not to
> make it happen. :-)

That's more than fine with me! :)

Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBSZbVYnEjvBPtnXfVAQKVxgP+NFpKibfYS5cjk68H/ImTYydGX82skFzP
vtKNEvJeYdLg+WCpC88W9mL8jqBiG4yyKIXXF2hlVkX74tZbR3FU+V1EbXSvC46d
rO5ZzFWMaVW/qrxepeY2tAiUCr82CVD1b6W8E0IAms7UjUKBPS9n2fYKsWOGEQph
1pLbdp7CBek=
=j0yP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086103.html below:

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*