A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/086088.html below:

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*

[Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.* [Python-Dev] The fate of 3.0.*Brett Cannon brett at python.org
Sat Feb 14 03:49:51 CET 2009
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 18:35, Benjamin Peterson <benjamin at python.org>wrote:

> Are we going to keep developing the 3.0 maintenance branch in
> expectation of releasing 3.0.2 sometime or will we just focus our
> efforts on 3.1?
>

I almost said "of course we are", but then I realized that 3.1 is going to
be very similar to 3.0.1 such that doing a final 3.0.x release probably is
not going to be worth it. Lord knows I sure don't want to have to port a bug
fix to *five* branches.

-Brett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20090213/aff725e4/attachment.htm>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4