Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 16:45, Daniel (ajax) Diniz <ajaksu at gmail.com
> <mailto:ajaksu at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Reproduction really is the same thing as providing a test.
>
> That was where I got confused: many issues are easy to reproduce
> ('test'), but need some thinking to get automated tests right.
>
> urllib always feels like this to me, except 'thinking' -> 'getting
> lost over and over'. Reading 'test needed' as 'automated test needed',
> things make a lot of sense. I have to test my patch against a good
> representation of the issue, regression tests must pass, 'automated
> test needed' fits well :)
>
>
> Go with "Unit test needed" so it's short and to the point and you have a
> deal. =)
>
Can I just say (without in any way wanting to get involved in what might
be considered as "work") that it's encouraging the tracker received a
bit more TLC we might eventually be able to see at least the occasional
week where the issue count increment was negative :)
So thanks to everyone who's taking the time to deal with this
low-profile not-very-glamorous issue. I, for one, appreciate it.
regards
Steve
--
Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC http://www.holdenweb.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4