A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085976.html below:

[Python-Dev] Expression optimizations

[Python-Dev] Expression optimizationsCesare Di Mauro cesare.dimauro at a-tono.com
Tue Feb 10 21:36:03 CET 2009
On Mar, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:38 PM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Cesare Di Mauro
> <cesare.dimauro at a-tono.com
>> wrote:
>
>> Could it be applyable to other operations as well? So, if I wrote:
>>  c = not(a < b)
>> the compiler and/or peephole optimizer can generate bytecodes
>> instructions
>> which, instead, execute the following operation:
>>  c = a >= b
>>
>
> Those two expressions are equivalent for integers, but not necessarily
> equivalent for objects that define their own comparison operator.

OK, so I can make assumptions only for built-in types.

Thank you

Cesare
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4