On Mar, Feb 10, 2009 at 05:38 PM, Daniel Stutzbach wrote: > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Cesare Di Mauro > <cesare.dimauro at a-tono.com >> wrote: > >> Could it be applyable to other operations as well? So, if I wrote: >> c = not(a < b) >> the compiler and/or peephole optimizer can generate bytecodes >> instructions >> which, instead, execute the following operation: >> c = a >= b >> > > Those two expressions are equivalent for integers, but not necessarily > equivalent for objects that define their own comparison operator. OK, so I can make assumptions only for built-in types. Thank you Cesare
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4