RetroSearch Browse

Sun Feb 8 02:00:47 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085941.html

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> We already have yield expressions and they mean something else...

They don't have a "*" in them, though, and I don't
think the existing meaning of yield as an expression
would carry over into the "yield *" variant, so there
shouldn't be any conflict.

But if you think there will be a conflict, or that the
similarity would be too confusing, maybe the new
construct should be called something else. I'm
open to suggestions.

-- 
Greg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085941.html below:

[Python-Dev] yield * (Re: Missing operator.call)