RetroSearch Browse

Sat Feb 7 10:31:35 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085931.html

On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
>  def f():
>    v = yield *g()
>    print v
>
>  def g():
>    yield 42
>    return "spam"

Function g violates the current limitation that generators can't
return with a value. So can g only be used using "yield *" then, or
would that limitation be removed?

- Willem

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085931.html below:

[Python-Dev] yield * (Re: Missing operator.call)