A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085911.html below:

[Python-Dev] Missing operator.call

[Python-Dev] Missing operator.call [Python-Dev] Missing operator.callStephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Fri Feb 6 10:15:33 CET 2009
Greg Ewing writes:

 > The fact that yielding is going on is not of
 > interest in that situation -- it's just an
 > implementation detail. What you really want to
 > express is calling another function, but without
 > losing your status of coroutine-ness.

But doesn't "yield" in the sense of "yield the right of way" mean
exactly that?  Or am I not understanding what you mean by retain
status as a coreoutine?

I don't know if this is an argument for or against using "yield" in
this context.

More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4