A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085904.html below:

[Python-Dev] Missing operator.call

[Python-Dev] Missing operator.call [Python-Dev] Missing operator.callGuido van Rossum guido at python.org
Fri Feb 6 06:22:13 CET 2009
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 9:20 PM, Greg Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> I've been thinking about proposing an enhancement
> concerning generators that would entail making
> "call" a reserved word, so I'd be a little
> disappointed if this name were used.
>
> Maybe apply() could be reinstated and put into
> the operator module?

That would lose the symmetry with __call__.

What's so special about your proposal that requires a new keyword?

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4