Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Is there a reason why the operator module doesn't have an operator.call > function? I've been thinking about proposing an enhancement concerning generators that would entail making "call" a reserved word, so I'd be a little disappointed if this name were used. Maybe apply() could be reinstated and put into the operator module? -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4