Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Is there a reason why the operator module doesn't have an operator.call
> function?
Python 2.6 adds operator.methodcaller. So you could use
operator.methodcaller('__call__'), but that's not really any better than
lambda x: x().
A patch to add operator.caller(*args, **kwargs) may be a good idea. Your
example would then be:
map(operator.caller(), lst)
That reads ok to me. I think this reads better though:
[callable() for callable in lst]
<wink>
-Andrew.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4