On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Collin Winter <collinw <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> Have any of the original objections to Calvin's patch >> (http://bugs.python.org/issue1706256) been addressed? If not, I don't >> see anything in these threads that justify resurrecting it. >> >> I still haven't seen any real code presented that would benefit from >> partial.skip or partial_right. > > The arguments for and against the patch could be brought against partial() > itself, so I don't understand the -1's at all. Quite so, but that doesn't justify adding more capabilities to partial(). Collin Winter
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4