RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 3 20:45:10 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085847.html

http://bugs.python.org/issue1706256

Took me a couple days to catch up on this thread so here is the link
for any interested. Could it be possible to reevaluate this?

On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Leif Walsh <leif.walsh at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Calvin Spealman <ironfroggy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I am just replying to the end of this thread to throw in a reminder
>> about my partial.skip patch, which allows the following usage:
>>
>> split_one = partial(str.split, partial.skip, 1)
>>
>> Not looking to say "mine is better", but if the idea is being given
>> merit, I like the skipping arguments method better than just the
>> "right partial", which I think is confusing combined with keyword and
>> optional arguments. And, this patch already exists. Could it be
>> re-evaluated?
>
> +1 but I don't know where the patch is.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Leif
>

-- 
Read my blog! I depend on your acceptance of my opinion! I am interesting!
http://techblog.ironfroggy.com/
Follow me if you're into that sort of thing: http://www.twitter.com/ironfroggy

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-February/085847.html below:

[Python-Dev] Partial function application 'from the right'