2009/12/30 Olemis Lang <olemis at gmail.com>: > Hmmm ... One of the issues I didn't notice ... > > IMO +1 for leaving it as it was before (i.e. __unittest) because : > > - the double underscore should mean (CMIIW) that it's an implementation detail > - not few libs use that name already ;o) > > +0.5 for adding `__unittest_ignore_traceback` or something shorter > (e.g. `__unittest_ignore`) too ... > > +1 for documenting that «hack» Someone should probably file a tracker request about this. -- Regards, Benjamin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4