On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:02, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote: > -1. This looks like typos the developer made on his versions definitions. Nah. > And if not, is subject to errors by forgetting dashes or dots. Eh, yeah but that goes for ANY syntax. Having the same syntax as for package specifications does make sense, though. (So we should clearly change that one too, eh?) -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4