A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-December/094679.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2

[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2 [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2Antoine Pitrou solipsis at pitrou.net
Mon Dec 28 08:02:46 CET 2009
> And in fact this case is often more the important one.  Packages that
> depend on having a *recent* version of python will often crash
> quickly, before doing permanent damage, when an undefined syntax,
> function, or method is invoked, while packages that depend on a quirk
> in behavior of an older version will typically silently corrupt data.

How can they know that they depend on "a quirk in behaviour of an older
version" if a newer version hasn't been released? This sounds bogus.

Besides, not letting me install their app/library on a newer Python just
because they are not /sure/ it will work is IMO an active nuisance. The
user should be treated as an adult.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4