A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-December/094675.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2

[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2 [Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 345 : Metadata for Python Software Packages 1.2Stephen J. Turnbull stephen at xemacs.org
Mon Dec 28 06:28:08 CET 2009
david.lyon at preisshare.net writes:

 > >> Before we had : Requires-Python: 2.5, 2.6
 > >>
 > >> That made much more sense. It was simple and unambiguous, and is
 > >> relevant to typical packaging scenarios.
 > >
 > > Unfortunately, it is fairly ambiguous, and makes no sense. It means
 > > "requires Python 2.5 *AND* requires Python 2.6", which is a requirement
 > > that no single version can meet.
 > 
 > No, it means a library requires either python 2.5 *OR* python 2.6 to be
 > installed properly.

If Martin and the SIG disagree on the interpretation (and I see
Martin's point: in ">=2.5, <2.6" the comma is a conjunction, not a
disjunction), that's too much ambiguity for me.

-1


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4