On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> This was ambiguous because it was unclear, as MvL stated, if "2.5" >> was just "2.5.0" or included >> versions like "2.5.1" or "2.5.2". > > How about having "2.5" match all 2.5.x versions, and "2.5.0" match only 2.5 > itself? (ditto for "2.5.N" matching only 2.5.N for N >= 1) > > This "~=" operator looks murkier than it needs to be IMO. An implicit range operator is simpler indeed, and achieves the same goal. Meaning that "<=2.5" for example, will be translated to "<=2.5.x" as well. Regards, Tarek
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4