On Dec 23, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Frank Wierzbicki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 5:58 PM, Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek at gmail.com> wrote: >> and for Linux and al, I am not sure but maybe a prefix for >> Jython/etc.. could be used >> for all paths. >> >> ~/.locale/lib/python/2.6/site-packages/... >> ~/.locale/jython/lib/python/2.6/site-packages/... >> >> (I didn't digg on how Jython organizes things yet, any hint would be >> appreciated) > Jython does not yet support user site-packages, but I think the above > looks like a fine structure for us when we get to implementing it. Two minor points: 1. It's "~/.local", not "~/.locale" ;-) 2. I think it would be a better idea to do "~/.local/lib/jython/2.6/site-packages". The idea with ~/.local is that it's a mirror of the directory structure convention in /, /usr/, /opt/ or /usr/local/. In other words it's got "bin", "lib", "share", "etc", etc.. ~/.local/jython/lib suggests that the parallel scripts directory would be ~/.local/jython/bin, which means I need 2 entries on my $PATH instead of one, which means yet more setup for people who use both Python and Jython per-user installation.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4