Martin v. Löwis wrote: >> But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too", >> you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10 >> lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago. > > Unfortunately, it is not obvious to me that the patch is correct, so I > couldn't check it in as-is. The review would probably take an hour or > two. I definitely plan on spending a lot more than 5 minutes on it - in particular, I want to see if I can find a way to avoid adding yet-more-test-code to the main binary. (Probably not, given the nature of the feature we're trying to test in this case, but I'm still going to try). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4