At 1261181806 time_t, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Only if some committer finds time for it, which is *really* scarce. > If you want to push that issue, I promise to review it after you have > reviewed five other patches. Well, that's disapointing. I work on several other free software projects, and my time is really scarce too. I understand blackmailing me to close a bug can be seen as a nice game. Honestly, if I had more time to get involve in that area, I'll take it as a game and would do it with pleasure. But in my current position and with "I-do-software-developement-too", you are just pissing me off for not fixing a bug in your program with a 10 lines long patch written by someone else 3 years ago. Something that should take 5 minutes, probably the time we both lost by writing our respective emails. Or give commit access, I'll do it for you. Anyway, thanks. Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰ <julien at danjou.info> http://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD // This is the end of my signature. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20091219/5f542366/attachment.pgp>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4