Julien Danjou wrote: > At 1261178549 time_t, Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> Is there to chance to see this *bug* fixed someday? >> Please ask on python-dev. I may be willing to revive my five-for-one offer. > > Not sure I really understand, but I can ask gain here: > will that patch, which seems correct finally merged and get this bug > closed? > Seems like a fair enough idea - I'll have a look at it in the next week or two. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4