On Dec 14, 2009, at 2:55 PM, Steven Bethard wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Olemis Lang <olemis at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Michael Foord >>> On 14/12/2009 19:04, Ian Bicking wrote: >>>> Another thing I just noticed is that argparse using -v for version >>>> where optparse does not (it only adds --version); most of my scripts >>>> that use -v to mean --verbose, causing problems. Since this is a poll >>>> question on the argparse site I assume this is an outstanding question >>> >>> I also use -v for verbose in a few scripts (including options to unittest >>> when run with python -m). I've seen -V as a common abbreviation for >>> --version (I've just used this with Mono for example). >> >> Many Unix commands accept these switches too . AFAICR there was an >> standard (well ...) set of command line options for Unix systems >> (can't find a link :-/ ) How about this one: http://www.shelldorado.com/goodcoding/cmdargs.html#flagnames S
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4