On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Darren Dale wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >>> Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >>>> Do you have a better suggestion ? I was thinking about StandardVersion >>>> but "Standard" >>>> doesn't really express what we want to achieve here I think, >>> I think StandardVersion is fine. >> >> I prefer StandardVersion as well. Rational (according to websters.com): > > Eric's suggestion of NormalizedVersion sounds best to me - it exactly > describes the intended role of the class. Ok, NormalizedVersion is fine with me, I'll change the doc + code accordingly Regards Tarek
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4