Darren Dale wrote: > On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: >> Tarek Ziadé <ziade.tarek <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> Do you have a better suggestion ? I was thinking about StandardVersion >>> but "Standard" >>> doesn't really express what we want to achieve here I think, >> I think StandardVersion is fine. > > I prefer StandardVersion as well. Rational (according to websters.com): Eric's suggestion of NormalizedVersion sounds best to me - it exactly describes the intended role of the class. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4