RetroSearch Browse

Thu Dec 10 14:20:44 CET 2009 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-December/094494.html

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Floris Bruynooghe
<floris.bruynooghe at gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
>> N.N[.N]+[{abc}N[.N]+][.postN][.devN]
>>
>> Notice that the last two +'s are gone, and overall I think this is more
>> consistent psuedo-code.
>
> That's quite readable and more consistent then the original
> pseudo-code, I like it.

Thanks, I have applied it. I have also added the full regular
expression in the PEP so things are clearer.

Regards,
Tarek

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2009-December/094494.html below:

[Python-Dev] Proposing PEP 386 for addition