On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 17:34, Michael Foord <fuzzyman at voidspace.org.uk> wrote: > Can you be more specific? Only with an insane amount of work. I'll hold that off for a while. > Relying on specific formatting for test results *sounds* like you are relying on an implementation detail Yeah, but that's doctests for you. And it's a mode of testing that makes sense when you test testrunners, as the result of a testrunner is the output. It's extremely hard to *not* test a testrunner without looking at the output. > Some of the failure reporting in unittest has *improved* in Python 2.7 - are you feeding the output of unittest back into doctest... ? Yes, as this is a testrunner being tested. -- Lennart Regebro: Python, Zope, Plone, Grok http://regebro.wordpress.com/ +33 661 58 14 64
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4