Terry Reedy wrote: > A nice demonstration of what an excellent piece of work the new .format > is or is becoming. I would still like it to be a goal for 3.2 that all > stdlib modules that work with formats accept the new formats and not > just % formats. > > Mark Summerfield only covered .format in his book on Python 3 programimg > and I hated to tell him that there was at least one module in the stdlib > that currently (3.1) requires the old style. Yes, we do need to do that. It would be nice if we could come up with a cleaner solution than a proliferation of parallel APIs everywhere though :( Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan at gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia ---------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4