On 30 aug 2009, at 16:34, Shashank Singh wrote: > just to give you an idea of the speed up: > > a 3.3 mb zip file extracted using the current all-python > implementation on my machine (win xp 1.67Ghz 1.5GB) > takes approximately 38 seconds. > > the same file when extracted using c implementation takes 0.4 seconds. If this matters to the users of the API, then likely they'd search for alternatives -- no need for it to go into the standard library just because it replaces functionality, or am I misunderstanding? - Ludvig Ericson <ludvig at lericson.se>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4