Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Michael Foord <fuzzyman <at> voidspace.org.uk> writes: > >> Really? Discussing the GoF design patterns by name seems to be prevalent >> amongst the programmers I know (yourself excluded of course...). >> > > Ah? I still haven't understood what "Gang of Four" is supposed to be, however. > Is it a design pattern? > The gang of four are the four folk who wrote the classic design patterns book: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns_%28book%29 Erich Gamma, Richard Helm, Ralph Johnson and John Vlissides. > Besides, saying "I use the strategy design pattern" doesn't tell a lot, while an > ad hoc description is much more informational (witness Martin's explanation for > example). > > It's like those frameworks who have a class simply named "Factory" ;) > Well, depending on the circumstances it can convey some to no information. :-) Michael > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk > -- http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/ http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4