2009/8/14 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com>: > Georg Brandl wrote: >> Nick Coghlan schrieb: >>> P.S. For anyone else that is slow like me, take a close look at PEP 387... >> >> What should we see, other than that we have two PEPs on the same topic that >> should be merged? > > Benjamin wrote the second one, so he obviously knows there's a written > deprecation policy in place, and hence his mini-rant probably wasn't > meant to be taken literally - a point I completely missed on first reading. IIRC, the point is probably the fact that PEP 387 has status "Draft" rather than "Accepted" - Benjamin proposed the PEP, met with a fair bit of discussion but no consensus, and everything fizzled out before a conclusion was reached. > I agree the two PEPs should probably be consolidated into one, but > absent a volunteer for that task, leaving them as is doesn't really hurt > anything. Agreed, if both were accepted... Paul. PS I personally have no firm opinion on PEP 387. The idea seems good, but I don't feel qualified to say whether the proposed approach is sound.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4