M.-A. Lemburg: > ... and because of this, the feature is already available if > you use codecs.open() instead of the built-in open(): So should I not add an issue for the basic open because codecs.open should be used for this case? Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4