On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Mark Dickinson<dickinsm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Vincent Legoll<vincent.legoll at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I've fed parts of the stdlib to pylint and after some filtering >> there appears to be some things that looks strange, I've >> filled a few bugs to the tracker for them. >> >> Is this useless and taking reviewer's time for nothing ? >> >> Please advise, if this is deemed useful, I'll continue further > > I think this is valuable work---please do continue! Thanks, I will > Just out of interest, how many false positives did you have > to filter out in finding the 5 cases above? I can't really tell if there was false positives, I just started with the low hanging fruits, the ones I immediately saw as fishy, the remaining I skipped without too much consideration, I think it will take many iterations to do the whole thing. I used a pylint version which is not capable of understanding py3k syntax, so a lot of files were simply skipped. -- Vincent Legoll
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4